Week 2 | Enterprise track
Finding Use Cases
- Week 2 of 12: AI integration for companies
- Promise: you will leave with a ranked list of use cases.
Outcomes
What You Will Be Able To Do
- Map a process from trigger to result
- Spot steps that suit AI patterns
- Score value and feasibility
- Place ideas on a matrix
- Write a one-page use case brief
Precision
Theme Versus Use Case
- Theme: 'use AI in customer service'
- Use case: draft first replies to billing emails
- A use case has a team, a task and a goal
- Without that, results never show in the numbers
Process mapping
Step 1: Map The Process
- Start with the trigger, end with the result
- List steps, owners, systems, time and errors
- Talk to people who do the work
- Real process differs from written procedure
Trigger: supplier invoice arrives
1. Clerk opens email (2 min)
2. Clerk keys fields (8 min)
3. Manager approves (waits 2 days)
Result: invoice paid and recorded
Where to look
Four Signals Of A Promising Step
- Repetition: same work many times a week
- Text or documents: reading, writing, searching
- Waiting: queue until someone reads or sorts
- Experts decide fast, newcomers struggle
Vocabulary
Seven AI Patterns
- Draft, summarize, classify, extract
- Search, forecast, flag
- AI prepares and suggests, a person decides
- No pattern fits: probably not a first candidate
| Pattern | Example |
|---|
| Draft | Reply to a billing email |
| Summarize | Ticket history before a call |
| Classify | Route a request |
| Extract | Fields from an invoice |
| Search | HR policy help desk |
| Forecast | Next month's demand |
Story
Case: Contract Review At A Large Bank
- Reported in 2017: loan agreements read by software
- Work said to take about 360,000 hours a year
- Many similar documents, clear questions, expert handles exceptions
- Target was first reading, not final judgment
Value
Step 2: Score Value
- Frequency times time per task times share saved
- 400 items at 10 minutes is about 67 hours a month
- Halving the time saves about 33 hours
- Also consider revenue, risk and quality
Value
Converting Value To A Score
- Agree ranges in advance, then score 1 to 5
- Write the assumption behind each score
- Do not claim precision you do not have
- Let others challenge the numbers
Feasibility
Step 3: Score Feasibility
- Data: exists, usable, allowed?
- Technology: connects to where work happens?
- Risk: what if output is wrong, who checks?
- Adoption: will the team use it, is there an owner?
Step 4: choose
The Value And Feasibility Matrix
- High value, high feasibility: quick win, do first
- High value, low feasibility: bet, plan with checkpoints
- Low value, high feasibility: fill-in, only if cheap
- Low value, low feasibility: drop
Value
^ BETS | QUICK WINS
| (invest) | (do first)
|---------------+-------------
| DROP | FILL-INS
+-----------------------------> Feasibility
Balance
Build A Portfolio
- Two or three quick wins show results in weeks
- One or two bets change the business over a year
- Quick wins build credibility and skill
- Only bets lose patience, only quick wins stay small
Decision tool
The One-Page Brief
- Process, team and problem in one sentence
- AI pattern, baseline and value estimate
- Feasibility scores with doubts noted
- Risk, who checks output, business owner
Summary
Recap
- Map the work before choosing tools
- Match steps to AI patterns
- Score value and feasibility with written assumptions
- Choose a portfolio of quick wins and bets
Week 3
Next Week
- Data readiness and governance
- Where company data lives
- Quality, access and ownership
- Why feasibility scores often fall here
Wrap up
Questions And Exercise
- Exercise: map one process and rank three to five ideas
- Write a one-page brief for the top quick win
- Share with a business owner for feedback
- Questions from the room