Enterprise AI, week 10
Operating Model
- Week 10 of 12: AI integration for companies
- Promise: you design who decides, builds and answers for AI
Outcomes
What You Can Do By The End
- Compare three operating models
- Define an AI council
- Describe a center of excellence
- Assign roles with one accountable owner
- Draft policies and a vendor checklist
Repeated questions
Why A Pilot Needs An Operating Model
- Who may approve a new tool?
- Who pays for it?
- Who answers when an output causes harm?
- Without answers, every team invents rules
Models
Three Ways To Organise
- Central: one team owns AI
- Federated: each unit builds its own
- Hub and spoke: shared standards, local ownership
- Most mid and large firms end at hub and spoke
| Model | Strength | Weakness |
|---|
| Central | Consistent | Bottleneck |
| Federated | Fast, close to work | Divergence |
| Hub and spoke | Shared rules, local owners | Needs clear boundaries |
Decision forum
The AI Council
- Seven to ten members with real authority
- Executive sponsor plus IT, security, legal, data protection
- HR, finance, business units and a user voice
- Monthly at first
Four things
What The Council Owns
- Approved use cases and risk tiers
- Policies
- Shared budget and priorities
- Review of incidents and results
- Record every decision and reason
Approval path
Risk Tiers Keep The Council Fast
- Low: standard checklist, no meeting
- Medium: hub review
- High: AI council, for example decisions on people
- Tier decided at intake by the hub
Team proposes use case
-> Hub assigns risk tier
-> Low: checklist, proceed
-> Medium: hub review
-> High: AI council decisionThe hub's working team
The Center Of Excellence
- Runs the platform and approved tools
- Provides templates, evaluation, training
- Supports discovery and pilots
- Publishes patterns that worked
Metrics
Measure The CoE By What Others Achieve
- Teams that run use cases on their own
- Reuse of templates
- Time from idea to pilot
- Satisfaction of business units
Why rules need a route
Case: Source Code In A Chat Window
- Employees pasted internal code into a public chatbot
- The company then restricted such tools
- The problem was real, so was the need
- Missing: an approved tool and a data rule
Name the people
Roles For Every Use Case
- Business owner: accountable for outcome
- Product owner: runs day to day
- Technical owner: security and uptime
- Data owner: approves data use
- Risk and compliance contact
Who does what
A RACI For One Use Case
- One accountable person per decision
- Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed
- Fill it before launch, not after an incident
| Decision | R | A | C | I |
|---|
| Go live | Product | Business | Security | Council |
| Change model | Technical | Product | Risk | Business |
| Pause system | Technical | Business | Risk | Council |
Plain language
Policies People Can Follow
- Acceptable use and forbidden data
- Approved tools and how to request one
- Human review and disclosure rules
- Personal data under KVKK and GDPR
- Incident reporting
Before signing and at renewal
Vendor Management
- Where is data stored and processed?
- Does our data train their models?
- Which sub processors and certifications?
- How are incidents and model changes announced?
- What happens to our data on exit?
Make it enforceable
Contracts And The Vendor Register
- Data processing agreement and service levels
- Notice periods for model changes
- Exit and export terms
- Register: owner, data, risk tier, renewal date
What to remember
Recap
- Hub and spoke fits most firms
- A small council with real authority
- Tiers keep approval fast
- One accountable owner per use case
- Short policies with a route, vendors on a register
Week 11
Next Week: Scaling And Risk
- Monitoring and human oversight
- Incident response, lock in, model change
Your turn
Questions And Exercise
- Draft a two page operating model
- Tier three use cases
- Test the vendor checklist on a real vendor